[Buildbot-devel] [PATCH] 2/2: triggerable schedulers
Dustin J. Mitchell
dustin at zmanda.com
Tue Jul 3 15:39:58 UTC 2007
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:35:47AM -0400, Greg Ward wrote:
> Cooool. I hope. I'm replying before playing with the patch, which is
> probably a bad idea. Oh well. My only real comment right now is
> about names: I think that having a BuildStep whose name ends in
> "Scheduler" could be really confusing. Some alternatives:
>
> * TriggerScheduler / TriggerStep
> ("a TriggerStep triggers a TriggerScheduler")
>
> * StepDoneScheduler / TriggerStep
> ("when a TriggerStep is done, the StepDoneSchedulers that depend
> on it fire")
>
> I think I like the symmetry and consistent terminology of
> TriggerScheduler/TriggerStep ... but it does sort of hog the word
> "trigger" for this purpose.
I agree. I also noticed that none of the other schedulers end in
"Scheduler", nor do steps end in "Step" so I would propose:
* Triggerable / Trigger
What do you think?
> Anyways, on paper the design looks quite sensible to me. I'll go see
> if I can make it work now...
Great -- let me know.
Dustin
--
Dustin J. Mitchell
Storage Software Engineer, Zmanda, Inc.
http://www.zmanda.com/
More information about the devel
mailing list