[Buildbot-devel] [PATCH] 2/2: triggerable schedulers

[Greg Ward]

[my idea]
> I think I like the symmetry and consistent terminology of
> TriggerScheduler/TriggerStep ... but it does sort of hog the word
> "trigger" for this purpose.

[Dustin replies]
> I agree.  I also noticed that none of the other schedulers end in
> "Scheduler", nor do steps end in "Step" so I would propose:
>
>   * Triggerable / Trigger
>
> What do you think?

I'm fine either way -- happy to leave it up to Brian, whose opinion is
the one that really matters.

[me again]
> Anyways, on paper the design looks quite sensible to me.  I'll go see
> if I can make it work now...

(cue slightly off-kilter maniacal laughter)
It works! it works!  First time out, no problems.  Perfect.  Except
for the names.  ;-)  Gotta run now ... I'll try to post details of
what I did later, so there's another example in the archives.

Greg