[users at bb.net] four digit years are good
Pierre Tardy
tardyp at gmail.com
Fri Apr 21 08:06:26 UTC 2017
haha makes even more sense!
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 9:12 AM Dan Kegel <dank at kegel.com> wrote:
> Hee hee. I'm too tired. I meant "four digit years are better than
> zero digit years" :-)
>
> The build status pages don't show any years at all in 0.8.12... "Apr 06
> 06:33"
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:59 PM, Pierre Tardy <tardyp at gmail.com> wrote:
> > hey Dan
> >
> > So you find it easier to distinguish 2016 vs 2017 rather than 17 vs 16?
> >
> > actually when I said it in my head it didn't make sense..
> > Now that I write it it make much more sense.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 8:29 AM Dan Kegel <dank at kegel.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Two digits bad. I wasted a bit of time today before noticing that a
> >> build was a year old, not a few hours old :-)
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> users mailing list
> >> users at buildbot.net
> >> https://lists.buildbot.net/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.buildbot.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20170421/122f4b1a/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list