[devel at bb.net] Plans for another beta this week

[Dustin J. Mitchell]

Great -- so we're pretty close to being able to do the beta?

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Pierre Tardy <tardyp at gmail.com> wrote:

> The PR1949 is not really mandatory to block the beta. Its only for doc,
> and we dont distribute doc with the betas. So when its done, it will be in
> docs/latest, and help the beta users too
>
>
> Le lun. 18 janv. 2016 à 12:45, Vladimir Rutsky <rutsky.vladimir at gmail.com>
> a écrit :
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Dustin J. Mitchell <dustin at buildbot.net>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi folks --
>> >
>> > Per last week's meeting, we had planned to ship a beta this week
>> containing
>> > Pierre's frontend work, then "freeze" development for a bit while
>> Vladimir
>> > lands his changes for bug 2340.
>> >
>> > So, I'm checking in on that process -- is master ready to ship
>> 0.9.0b5?  I'm
>> > guessing https://github.com/buildbot/buildbot/pull/1949 and a few other
>> > things need to land first?
>>
>> From my side I would like to push few minor PR that currently included
>> in my PR for 2340, but not related to 2340 bug:
>>
>> 1. First part of transition to flake8 (replace pyflakes+pep8 with
>> pyflake8, *without* removing "hush_pyflakes" in code).
>>
>> 2. Don't set colors in validate.sh if output is not TTY (e.g. for
>> running validate.sh in post-commit hook from GUI git application, like
>> git-gui).
>>
>> I will push them soon.
>>
>> --
>> Vladimir
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel at buildbot.net
>> https://lists.buildbot.net/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.buildbot.net/pipermail/devel/attachments/20160118/0f995420/attachment.html>