[Buildbot-devel] trac overzealous -- or not?

[Dustin J. Mitchell]

It's not, you, it's Trac.  The version we're using is ancient and does
a terrible job of spam filtering.

Amar is working hard to set up Trac-1.0 on the new systems at OSUOSL.
I think we're almost ready, and should be able to switch over sometime
this week.

Dustin

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Dan Kegel <dank at kegel.com> wrote:
> So I tried to add this comment to
> http://trac.buildbot.net/ticket/1764
>
> I think I just reproduced it.  HUP doesn't successfully change
> MailNotifier reconfiguration, but stopping and starting does.  (HUP
> works for builder reconfiguration.)
> This is with v0.8.7p1 plus a few patches.
>
> and Trac said
>
> Submission rejected as potential spam (SpamBayes determined spam
> probability of 65.23%)
>
> My IP address was  204.154.109.20
>
> Seems a bit overzealous.  Or was my site sending spam?  It's possible
> there was a breakin.
>
> How could I check the reason for the classification?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Put Bad Developers to Shame
> Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration
> Continuously Automate Build, Test & Deployment
> Start a new project now. Try Jenkins in the cloud.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/13600_Cloudbees
> _______________________________________________
> Buildbot-devel mailing list
> Buildbot-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/buildbot-devel