[Buildbot-devel] Buildbot 1.0: The Shimmering Vision
Mark Roddy
markroddy at gmail.com
Mon Aug 11 18:46:19 UTC 2008
On 8/11/08, Dustin J. Mitchell <dustin at zmanda.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Mark Roddy <markroddy at gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1 on wiki integration and build manager app. It'd be nice if I could
> > go to a buildbot admin web page to make quick changes rather then
> > having to ssh into the box, edit master.cfg, and restart the instance.
>
>
> The conflict I'm seeing here is between buildbot as a flexible,
> general framework for continuous integration testing (capable of
> supporting all of the weird uses we've seen in this thread so far) and
> buildbot as a well-defined (and thus necessarily limited) application
> which has knobs that can be spun via web. The framework idea implies,
> to me, that buildbot configurations are actually programs, which means
> they aren't really editable (except via a <textarea>, I suppose) via
> the web.
>
> The means I see for avoiding this conflict is to provide some tools
> for building administrative interfaces, and ship a basic
> trigger-these-builds-on-every-commit configuration which includes an
> administrative interface. Then folks who can get by with the basic
> configuration get a web interface, and folks with more advanced
> configuration needs can either roll their own administrative interface
> or forgo it entirely.
>
> What do you think?
>
>
> --
> Storage Software Engineer
> http://www.zmanda.com
>
I'm in total agreement. I think that an admin web interface should be
pretty add-on that maybe makes it easier to set up a basic build
process (lowering the upfront setup cost to a new user), and
complicated build configurations would have to write their own
configuration. I actually was thinking that such a web interface
wouldn't need to be more then a front end for editing master.cfg.
-Mark
More information about the devel
mailing list