[users at bb.net] force scheduler skipping builds

[Elliot Saba]

Thanks Bill, you nailed it.  I changed my configuration
<https://github.com/staticfloat/julia-buildbot/commit/7d9db75321d234a40ca4446960fcd02d59c8fe2b>
to no longer collapse these changes, and now it's working great.
-E

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
wrote:

> Did you look at:
> https://docs.buildbot.net/current/manual/cfg-builders.
> html#collapsing-build-requests
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Elliot Saba <staticfloat at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Bump.  Does anyone have any idea why this would be happening?  If you
>> need more information to diagnose this problem, I would be happy to provide
>> it.
>> -E
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Elliot Saba <staticfloat at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello again,
>>>
>>> I have two schedulers defined to package my binaries.  The first, is an
>>> AnyBranchScheduler
>>> <https://github.com/staticfloat/julia-buildbot/blob/8c7859d3136c10f3236e4e11cbd408d773123029/master/package.py#L319-L328> that
>>> has a treeStableTimer defined.  The second, defined right below, is a
>>> ForceScheduler
>>> <https://github.com/staticfloat/julia-buildbot/blob/8c7859d3136c10f3236e4e11cbd408d773123029/master/package.py#L339-L356>
>>> .
>>>
>>> I am working on creating some tooling that allows us to force-schedule
>>> builds easily from the GitHub interface, and I discovered that if I
>>> force-schedule two builds, the first flips to results code 3, e.g. it is
>>> SKIPPED
>>> <http://docs.buildbot.net/latest/developer/results.html#buildbot.process.results.SKIPPED>
>>> .
>>>
>>> This is the exact behavior that I would expect if the ForceScheduler had
>>> a treeStableTimer applied to it, however, it does not, it's the
>>> AnyBranchScheduler that has one.
>>>
>>> It seems to me like the AnyBranchScheduler's `treeStableTimer` is
>>> messing with the builds from my ForceScheduler.  I may be conflating two
>>> entirely unrelated things, but if so, I'd appreciate any help in tracking
>>> this down.  I definitely want a tree stable timer on the
>>> AnyBranchScheduler, because otherwise merge commits can easily rack up days
>>> worth of CI time, as each build takes about an hour to complete, however I
>>> can't lose force scheduled builds willy-nilly.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -E
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> users at buildbot.net
>> https://lists.buildbot.net/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.buildbot.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20170321/69ae815e/attachment.html>