[users at bb.net] 0.9.0rc2 and build with no steps.

[Neil Gilmore]

Hi Pierre,

Yes, it does. Thanks.

Neil Gilmore
grammatech.com

On 9/8/2016 3:22 PM, Pierre Tardy wrote:
>
> Ok so every thing makes sense then?
>
>
> Le jeu. 8 sept. 2016 22:18, Neil Gilmore <ngilmore at grammatech.com 
> <mailto:ngilmore at grammatech.com>> a écrit :
>
>     Hi Pierre,
>
>     (trimmed a bit)
>
>     On 9/8/2016 3:07 PM, Pierre Tardy wrote:
>     >
>     > In this case I would expect two things
>     >
>     > If there are no connected workers for that build the build
>     should stay
>     > queued forever
>     >
>
>     It would, except that I've slightly modified the code to not consider
>     revision when collapsing requests (we always want the most
>     recent). So a
>     build request gets swallowed when a new one is scheduled. I can
>     see the
>     most recent request in the queue.
>
>     > If a worker is trying to connect with a spelling mistake on its name
>     > the master should display a log saying that they is wrong
>     > authentication for the worker and the worker should also constantly
>     > complain about a authentication denied or something
>     >
>
>     To the master, it's not a spelling error (I've seen enough of those
>     errors elsewhere, usually when I had to update a worker and
>     botched the
>     workername). The master thinks everything is fine. It just has an
>     entry
>     in its c['workers'] that no worker process will ever match.
>
>     There's no worker process (by that name) to complain.  And no worker
>     ever tries to attach by that name.
>
>     Thanks!
>
>     Neil Gilmore
>     grammatech.com <http://grammatech.com>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.buildbot.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20160908/d7b9b16f/attachment.html>