[users at bb.net] 0.9.0rc2 and build with no steps.

[Neil Gilmore]

Hi Pierre,

(trimmed a bit)

On 9/8/2016 3:07 PM, Pierre Tardy wrote:
>
> In this case I would expect two things
>
> If there are no connected workers for that build the build should stay 
> queued forever
>

It would, except that I've slightly modified the code to not consider 
revision when collapsing requests (we always want the most recent). So a 
build request gets swallowed when a new one is scheduled. I can see the 
most recent request in the queue.

> If a worker is trying to connect with a spelling mistake on its name 
> the master should display a log saying that they is wrong 
> authentication for the worker and the worker should also constantly 
> complain about a authentication denied or something
>

To the master, it's not a spelling error (I've seen enough of those 
errors elsewhere, usually when I had to update a worker and botched the 
workername). The master thinks everything is fine. It just has an entry 
in its c['workers'] that no worker process will ever match.

There's no worker process (by that name) to complain.  And no worker 
ever tries to attach by that name.

Thanks!

Neil Gilmore
grammatech.com