[users at bb.net] Another anecdote, with possible bug.

[Pierre Tardy]

Hi Neil,
Thanks for the info, this is indeed a design problem that was unknown to me.
The collapse function will only work in case of a symmetric multimaster
setup.

in 0.8, the collapsing was done at the build start time, this is why the
config was done in the builder.
Now it is made at the buildrequest insertion time so that the collapsing
algorithm can be more efficient

You can workaround this by configuring dummy builderconfig with only your
collapse algorithm (and perhaps attach a dummy slave that is meant to be
always disconnected)

Pierre

Le mar. 22 nov. 2016 à 23:20, Neil Gilmore <ngilmore at grammatech.com> a
écrit :

> Hi everyone,
>
> We might have a possible multi-master bug. Maybe it's already known.
>
> It appears that if collapseRequests is active, buildrequests will only
> collapse if the scheduler and builder are both on the same master.
> Otherwise, it appears as though the collapse function will never be
> found, and the build will not collapse.
>
> We're getting some requests queueing up that we didn't want.
>
> Neil Gilmore
> grammatech.com
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at buildbot.net
> https://lists.buildbot.net/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.buildbot.net/pipermail/users/attachments/20161123/8364c9a1/attachment.html>