[Buildbot-devel] Looking for suggestions (TrySchedulers - Buildbot 0.9)
Francesco Di Mizio
francescodimizio at gmail.com
Wed Jan 28 10:07:07 UTC 2015
I wouldn't mind using it and file issues. In this case I'd have to know an
(even very imprecise) ETA for 0.9 to be stable/released.
What I am really looking forward to is the API that's coming with 0.9, it
seems to be entirely missing on 0.8. Would this be a 0.9 feature already
functioning ok?
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 4:39 AM, Dustin J. Mitchell <dustin at v.igoro.us>
wrote:
> There are a few folks out there using 'master' right now, but it's
> still early days. It's very helpful for us to get early feedback, but
> if you were to use it you'd definitely find yourself doing so :)
>
> Dustin
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Francesco Di Mizio
> <francescodimizio at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks Dustin,
> >
> > that's what I thought too. I'll go the custom/scripting way.
> >
> > What about (copy and paste from above)
> >
> > Also I've been following http://nine.buildbot.net/#/ with interest.
> Since
> > it's going to take a while to set all up, can it make sense for me to
> start
> > off with 0.9 directly? Any idea as to when 0.9 might be out?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Francesco
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Dustin J. Mitchell <dustin at v.igoro.us>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes, at the moment the try schedulers have a fairly intricate
> >> interface with Buildbot via Perspective Broker. If you didn't want to
> >> install Buildbot, but were comfortable installing Twisted and some
> >> custom Python code, you could emulate `buildbot try` without too much
> >> difficulty.
> >>
> >> Dustin
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Francesco Di Mizio
> >> <francescodimizio at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Hello there,
> >> >
> >> > in the past at the company I was working for we used to have a
> buildbot
> >> > based system mainly used for CL validation (making sure it compiles
> >> > before
> >> > checking it in).
> >> >
> >> > This was based on a minimalistic webpage that would in turn call some
> >> > buildbot python api to a add a change to BB (it might have been
> >> > addSourceStamp) so that it would show up on the left side of the
> >> > waterfall.
> >> > The schedulers being used were AnyBranchSchedulers. Without a
> successful
> >> > 'test' a p4 trigger would prevent you from checking in.
> >> >
> >> > That approach can somehow be compared to
> >> >
> >> >
> https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/tools/build/+/master/scripts/master/try_job_base.py
> >> >
> >> > I've then noticed that Buildbot comes with TrySchedulers. I am now in
> >> > the
> >> > middle of setting up something very similar to what I described above
> >> > and
> >> > was wondering if I can get away with it by using TrySchdulers.
> >> >
> >> > As far as I understand by reading the docs, a developer needs to run
> >> > 'buildbot try', which I'd assume requires buildbot to be set up on
> their
> >> > machine, which is a requirement I would like to avoid. Please correct
> me
> >> > if
> >> > I am wrong.
> >> >
> >> > Also I've been following http://nine.buildbot.net/#/ with interest.
> >> > Since
> >> > it's going to take a while to set all up, can it make sense for me to
> >> > start
> >> > off with 0.9 directly?
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Francesco
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
> >> > GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in
> >> > Ashburn.
> >> > Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
> >> > Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely
> compliant.
> >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Buildbot-devel mailing list
> >> > Buildbot-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/buildbot-devel
> >> >
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://buildbot.net/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150128/b14df2cc/attachment.html>
More information about the devel
mailing list