[Buildbot-devel] Looking for suggestions (TrySchedulers - Buildbot 0.9)
Francesco Di Mizio
francescodimizio at gmail.com
Sun Feb 1 23:46:56 UTC 2015
Did further investigations:
Make forntend fails with:
bash.exe"-3.1$ make frontend
pip install -e pkg
Obtaining file:///e:/bbsrc/buildbot/pkg
Running setup.py (path:e:/bbsrc/buildbot/pkg\setup.py) egg_info for
package fr
om file:///e:/bbsrc/buildbot/pkg
Installing collected packages: buildbot-pkg
Running setup.py develop for buildbot-pkg
Creating c:\python27\lib\site-packages\buildbot-pkg.egg-link (link to .)
buildbot-pkg 0.9.0 is already the active version in easy-install.pth
Installed e:\bbsrc\buildbot\pkg
Successfully installed buildbot-pkg
Cleaning up...
pip install mock
Requirement already satisfied (use --upgrade to upgrade): mock in
c:\python27\li
b\site-packages
Cleaning up...
for i in www/*/; do pip install -e $i ; done
Obtaining file:///e:/bbsrc/buildbot/www/base
Running setup.py (path:e:/bbsrc/buildbot/www/base\setup.py) egg_info for
packa
ge from file:///e:/bbsrc/buildbot/www/base
npm install
error: command 'npm' failed: No such file or directory
Complete output from command python setup.py egg_info:
running egg_info
npm install
error: command 'npm' failed: No such file or directory
----------------------------------------
Cleaning up...
Command python setup.py egg_info failed with error code 1 in
e:/bbsrc/buildbot/w
ww/waterfall_view
Storing debug log for failure in C:\Users\Riziero\pip\pip.log
make: *** [frontend] Error 1
bash.exe"-3.1$
Above I stripped out the 3 parts as it fails the same way with all 4 www
subfolder.
I can run ok npm, by issuing "npm" I get the help.
Cheers,
Francesco
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Francesco Di Mizio <
francescodimizio at gmail.com> wrote:
> I failed to install Nine following that tutorial.
>
> I was on Win and did everything on a Linux like shell (GitBash). Better do
> it on Linux?
>
> First off: do i necesserally need to create a virtualenv? I tried without
> (had to install pywin32) and upon buildbot master startup I got:
>
> File "e:\bbsrc\buildbot\master\buildbot\www\service.py", line 121, in
> setupSite
> raise RuntimeError("could not find buildbot-www; is it installed?")
> exceptions.RuntimeError: could not find buildbot-www; is it installed?
>
> Wanted then to give virualenv a try and repeat - didnt go that far as I
> have got no idea how get the virtualenv to see pywin32.
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Pierre Tardy <tardyp at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> We used to have daily builds of aster branch, but this has been
>> temporarily stopped until we sort out some of our new infra work
>> So the package here are slightly outdated, and some are actually broken.
>> ftp://ftp.buildbot.net/pub/latest/
>>
>> So right now the best is to follow this quick start guide:
>>
>> https://github.com/buildbot/buildbot/blob/master/master/docs/developer/www.rst#hacking-quick-start
>>
>>
>> Le Wed Jan 28 2015 at 12:37:41 PM, Francesco Di Mizio <
>> francescodimizio at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>> It works like a charm.
>>>
>>> Very last question: suggested ways to get nine up and running? Should I
>>> just get the code and install form there?
>>> I remeber reading a discussion about this, cant seem to find it.
>>>
>>> Francesco
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Pierre Tardy <tardyp at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> You can have a look at chrome developer tools (network tab) to see the
>>>> use of REST api.
>>>> The url you should use is:
>>>> http://nine.buildbot.net/api/v2/builders/1
>>>>
>>>> in
>>>> http://nine.buildbot.net/#/about
>>>> You have a formal description of all REST apis
>>>>
>>>> There are all straighforward mapping the internal 'data' api, which is
>>>> described here:
>>>> http://docs.buildbot.net/latest/developer/data.html
>>>>
>>>> HTH
>>>> Pierre
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le Wed Jan 28 2015 at 12:11:16 PM, Francesco Di Mizio <
>>>> francescodimizio at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Hey Pierre,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks a lot for the kind reply.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's good news. I can probably do without those missing features.
>>>>>
>>>>> The part I am mostly interested in as I said above is
>>>>> http://docs.buildbot.net/latest/developer/www.html , in particual the
>>>>> rest api. I've given it a try with something simple against
>>>>> nine.buildbot.net.
>>>>> According to that page http://nine.buildbot.net/#/api/v2/builder/1
>>>>> should return me something meaningdul while I only get redirected to Home.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Pierre Tardy <tardyp at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Francesco,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For me, master branch is really useable for small and medium use
>>>>>> cases.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are a few feature missing (rebuild, stop builds, authorization
>>>>>> framework, log compression), that are preventing us to release a first
>>>>>> version. I would estimate something like 3-4 mm of work to finish this make
>>>>>> sure it is stable. The thing is that this project has no full time
>>>>>> developer working on it, so its hard to get an ETA.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would advise you to start your work on master branch, and if there
>>>>>> are bottlenecks, we can help you fix them or you can decide to switch back
>>>>>> to eight later.
>>>>>> There are very few change in configuration API between eight and
>>>>>> nine, so the work you do on nine can be reused on eight platform with very
>>>>>> few adjustments.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le Wed Jan 28 2015 at 11:09:36 AM, Francesco Di Mizio <
>>>>>> francescodimizio at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I wouldn't mind using it and file issues. In this case I'd have to
>>>>>>> know an (even very imprecise) ETA for 0.9 to be stable/released.
>>>>>>> What I am really looking forward to is the API that's coming with
>>>>>>> 0.9, it seems to be entirely missing on 0.8. Would this be a 0.9 feature
>>>>>>> already functioning ok?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 4:39 AM, Dustin J. Mitchell <
>>>>>>> dustin at v.igoro.us> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There are a few folks out there using 'master' right now, but it's
>>>>>>>> still early days. It's very helpful for us to get early feedback,
>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>> if you were to use it you'd definitely find yourself doing so :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dustin
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Francesco Di Mizio
>>>>>>>> <francescodimizio at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> > Thanks Dustin,
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > that's what I thought too. I'll go the custom/scripting way.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > What about (copy and paste from above)
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Also I've been following http://nine.buildbot.net/#/ with
>>>>>>>> interest. Since
>>>>>>>> > it's going to take a while to set all up, can it make sense for
>>>>>>>> me to start
>>>>>>>> > off with 0.9 directly? Any idea as to when 0.9 might be out?
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>>>>> > Francesco
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Dustin J. Mitchell <
>>>>>>>> dustin at v.igoro.us>
>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> Yes, at the moment the try schedulers have a fairly intricate
>>>>>>>> >> interface with Buildbot via Perspective Broker. If you didn't
>>>>>>>> want to
>>>>>>>> >> install Buildbot, but were comfortable installing Twisted and
>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>> >> custom Python code, you could emulate `buildbot try` without too
>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>> >> difficulty.
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> Dustin
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Francesco Di Mizio
>>>>>>>> >> <francescodimizio at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >> > Hello there,
>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> >> > in the past at the company I was working for we used to have a
>>>>>>>> buildbot
>>>>>>>> >> > based system mainly used for CL validation (making sure it
>>>>>>>> compiles
>>>>>>>> >> > before
>>>>>>>> >> > checking it in).
>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> >> > This was based on a minimalistic webpage that would in turn
>>>>>>>> call some
>>>>>>>> >> > buildbot python api to a add a change to BB (it might have been
>>>>>>>> >> > addSourceStamp) so that it would show up on the left side of
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> >> > waterfall.
>>>>>>>> >> > The schedulers being used were AnyBranchSchedulers. Without a
>>>>>>>> successful
>>>>>>>> >> > 'test' a p4 trigger would prevent you from checking in.
>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> >> > That approach can somehow be compared to
>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/tools/build/+/master/scripts/master/try_job_base.py
>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> >> > I've then noticed that Buildbot comes with TrySchedulers. I am
>>>>>>>> now in
>>>>>>>> >> > the
>>>>>>>> >> > middle of setting up something very similar to what I
>>>>>>>> described above
>>>>>>>> >> > and
>>>>>>>> >> > was wondering if I can get away with it by using TrySchdulers.
>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> >> > As far as I understand by reading the docs, a developer needs
>>>>>>>> to run
>>>>>>>> >> > 'buildbot try', which I'd assume requires buildbot to be set
>>>>>>>> up on their
>>>>>>>> >> > machine, which is a requirement I would like to avoid. Please
>>>>>>>> correct me
>>>>>>>> >> > if
>>>>>>>> >> > I am wrong.
>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> >> > Also I've been following http://nine.buildbot.net/#/ with
>>>>>>>> interest.
>>>>>>>> >> > Since
>>>>>>>> >> > it's going to take a while to set all up, can it make sense
>>>>>>>> for me to
>>>>>>>> >> > start
>>>>>>>> >> > off with 0.9 directly?
>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> >> > Cheers,
>>>>>>>> >> > Francesco
>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> >> > New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in
>>>>>>>> Ashburn, VA.
>>>>>>>> >> > GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> >> > Ashburn.
>>>>>>>> >> > Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of
>>>>>>>> bandwidth.
>>>>>>>> >> > Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely
>>>>>>>> compliant.
>>>>>>>> >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
>>>>>>>> >> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> >> > Buildbot-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>> >> > Buildbot-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/buildbot-devel
>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
>>>>>>> sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media,
>>>>>>> is your
>>>>>>> hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
>>>>>>> leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more.
>>>>>>> Take a
>>>>>>> look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.
>>>>>>> net/_______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Buildbot-devel mailing list
>>>>>>> Buildbot-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/buildbot-devel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://buildbot.net/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150202/eaee3875/attachment.html>
More information about the devel
mailing list