[Buildbot-devel] lazy logs a bit too lazy and que'ed requests not being processed

Francesco Di Mizio francescodimizio at gmail.com
Mon Oct 13 09:50:49 UTC 2014


Yep you are right I'll see their mailing list.

One very last thing: Should I need to provide them with more details, could
you please point me to the relevant code for streaming logs?

FDM

On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Dustin J. Mitchell <dustin at v.igoro.us>
wrote:

> At this point it's an Apache question, so you might have better luck
> seeking out Apache experts (of which I, at least, am not one).
>
> Dustin
>
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Francesco Di Mizio
> <francescodimizio at gmail.com> wrote:
> > No sure of this can be of any help:
> >
> > apache's error.log:
> >
> > [Fri Oct 10 12:54:17 2014] [debug] proxy_util.c(1818): proxy: grabbed
> > scoreboard slot 1 in child 7231 for worker proxy:reverse
> > [Fri Oct 10 12:54:17 2014] [debug] proxy_util.c(1837): proxy: worker
> > proxy:reverse already initialized
> > [Fri Oct 10 12:54:17 2014] [debug] proxy_util.c(1934): proxy: initialized
> > single connection worker 1 in child 7231 for (*)
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Francesco Di Mizio
> > <francescodimizio at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I can't seem to find a solution for this, I'll give up for now. Really
> ran
> >> out of ideas.
> >>
> >> Initially in my email I mentioned one more issue other than the one
> we've
> >> been discussing.
> >>
> >> I'll just start a new thread not to mess this thread up.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Francesco Di Mizio
> >> <francescodimizio at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Well according to the docs I don't see how dropping that to 512 could
> >>> have any effect as based on the docs:
> >>>
> >>> The size must be at least 8192.
> >>>
> >>> I gave it a try anyway with no visible results.
> >>>
> >>> Forget about lazy logs in the buildbot sense of the term, I am not
> using
> >>> them either.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for your help :)
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Oct 8, 2014, at 9:46 AM, Francesco Di Mizio
> >>>> <francescodimizio at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> In a previous reply, Charles wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> In Apache, I dropped the proxy buffer from the default of 8 kB to 512
> >>>> byte.
> >>>>
> >>>> I am assuming you are talking about the ProxyReceiveBufferSize. Am I
> >>>> assuming right?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> actually, it was ProxyIOBufferSize, which also defaults to 8kB:
> >>>>
> >>>> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy.html#proxyiobuffersize
> >>>>
> >>>> I don't remember why I adjusted that one versus the receive buffer.
> This
> >>>> is with Apache 2.2.
> >>>>
> >>>> Also, I am not using "lazy logs" - I didn't realize that was a
> specific
> >>>> term. I was just trying to follow normal stdio logs with less delay.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Charles Lepple
> >>>> clepple at gmail
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://buildbot.net/pipermail/devel/attachments/20141013/2dbbb9d8/attachment.html>


More information about the devel mailing list