[Buildbot-devel] BuildStep tangle

Tom Prince tom.prince at ualberta.net
Sat Feb 25 15:54:28 UTC 2012


On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 00:01:37 -0800, Ian Zimmerman <itz at buug.org> wrote:
> I'd still love to get rid of the parms thing, but I guess if I keep to
> explicitly named arguments in my own subclasses and always call the
> parent constructor with all the nameless stuff, I don't need to concern
> myself with it.  Right?

Yes. In fact, you probably won't need to worry about positional
arguments at all. They only really work when they are destined for the
leaf class that you are calling. The reason that I handle them in
BuildStep.__new__ is to preserve that behavior, but that is an
implementation detail, that users don't need to worry about.

  Tom




More information about the devel mailing list