[Buildbot-devel] required fields forcing a build

Pierre Tardy tardyp at gmail.com
Thu Sep 15 17:48:31 UTC 2011


On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Todd Cooper <todd_cooper at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Maybe you should get yours in as mine probably partially relies on yours.
>
This is located here:
https://github.com/tardyp/buildbot/commits/authzsession

> I could test it as well since I am using LDAP (that was included, correct)?

The LDAP IAuth plugin is not there, I actual have my own private auth
plugin which do not rely on LDAP, but rather on our local infra.

I dont think ldap will be difficult to implement.

Regards
Pierre



>
> ________________________________
> From: Pierre Tardy <tardyp at gmail.com>
> To: Todd Cooper <todd_cooper at yahoo.com>
> Cc: Dustin J. Mitchell <dustin at v.igoro.us>;
> "buildbot-devel at lists.sourceforge.net"
> <buildbot-devel at lists.sourceforge.net>
> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 10:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [Buildbot-devel] required fields forcing a build
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Todd Cooper <todd_cooper at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I am familiarizing myself with the python stuff that makes up buildbot.
>> I got drawn away and I am working on some work things unrelated.  I will
>> have something before long.
> ok, then. I'll be working on it next week since I'm pretty much done
> on the authz session stuff.
>
> Regard,
> Pierre
>
>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Pierre Tardy <tardyp at gmail.com>
>> To: Todd Cooper <todd_cooper at yahoo.com>
>> Cc: Dustin J. Mitchell <dustin at v.igoro.us>;
>> "buildbot-devel at lists.sourceforge.net"
>> <buildbot-devel at lists.sourceforge.net>
>> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 4:30 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Buildbot-devel] required fields forcing a build
>>
>> Hey Todd,
>> Any news on this topic? some code to share?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Pierre
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Todd Cooper <todd_cooper at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> I will give the people enough rope to hang themselves.  No fancy regex
>>> for
>>> me.
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Dustin J. Mitchell <dustin at v.igoro.us>
>>> To: Todd Cooper <todd_cooper at yahoo.com>
>>> Cc: "buildbot-devel at lists.sourceforge.net"
>>> <buildbot-devel at lists.sourceforge.net>
>>> Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2011 10:00 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Buildbot-devel] required fields forcing a build
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Todd Cooper <todd_cooper at yahoo.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I will add naming the repo into it, but on the condition that the
>>>> repository
>>>> if the same type.
>>>> Apples and oranges cannot be mixed here (well maybe in Waldorf salad).
>>>> I will also add it to be turned on, but easily disabled.
>>>>
>>>> I also have to look how this mixes with templates as this needs a
>>>> template.
>>>
>>> There's no notion of repository "type" in Buildbot.  I would advise
>>> against trying to write vc-specific regexes to recognize certain
>>> types.  I think this is a place you can give the user some extra rope.
>>> It should be easy for people to subclass the scheduler if they need
>>> to limit the repos that can be specified (e.g., for security reasons).
>>>
>>> Dustin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Why Cloud-Based Security and Archiving Make Sense
>>> Osterman Research conducted this study that outlines how and why cloud
>>> computing security and archiving is rapidly being adopted across the IT
>>> space for its ease of implementation, lower cost, and increased
>>> reliability. Learn more. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51425301/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Buildbot-devel mailing list
>>> Buildbot-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/buildbot-devel
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>




More information about the devel mailing list