[Buildbot-devel] Mercurial: commit vs changegroup hook

[Dustin J. Mitchell]

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Marcus Lindblom <macke at yar.nu> wrote:
>> Do you guys who are working with Mercurial already had this issue ?
>
> No, we use a remote repo on our server that triggers the buildbot.
> No-one ever commits there, everyone just push and pull. This is a pretty
> common scenario.

Is it reasonable to require this kind of arrangement?  From the git
perspective, I think it would be unwise for Buildbot to monitor a repo
in which active development was taking place.

Dustin

-- 
Open Source Storage Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com