[Buildbot-devel] Mercurial: commit vs changegroup hook

Dustin J. Mitchell dustin at zmanda.com
Tue Feb 2 18:24:58 UTC 2010

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Marcus Lindblom <macke at yar.nu> wrote:
>> Do you guys who are working with Mercurial already had this issue ?
> No, we use a remote repo on our server that triggers the buildbot.
> No-one ever commits there, everyone just push and pull. This is a pretty
> common scenario.

Is it reasonable to require this kind of arrangement?  From the git
perspective, I think it would be unwise for Buildbot to monitor a repo
in which active development was taking place.


Open Source Storage Engineer

More information about the devel mailing list