[Buildbot-devel] slave state able to cause buildstep creation?

[Mike Winter (miwinter)]

Thank you for your prompt response. 

How would a buildstep be able to make a slave cause the master do a
reconfig?

-----Original Message-----
From: djmitche at gmail.com [mailto:djmitche at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Dustin
J. Mitchell
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 9:25 AM
To: Mike Winter (miwinter)
Cc: Buildbot-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Buildbot-devel] slave state able to cause buildstep
creation?

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Mike Winter
(miwinter)<miwinter at cisco.com> wrote:
> The reason I cant do the find and run in the single step is I want
> granularity and visibility at the level indicated i.e. a cell per
> runner.sh.

This is going to be hard -- buildsteps are defined at config time, and
are fixed for a builder -- you can't define specific buildsteps for a
specific build.

Note that you *can* capture the output of 'find' into a property
(SetProperty) and then use that in a subsequent step.  But dynamic
creation of steps is not possible.

Dustin

-- 
Open Source Storage Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com