[Buildbot-devel] multiple dependent schedulers?

[Axel Hecht]

2007/8/10, Robert Helmer <robert at roberthelmer.com>:
> On 8/5/07, Axel Hecht <l10n.moz at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > I could play mind games about using build properties to control where
> > in the super build to start off, too, but that would likely require to
> > hack both the steps and the build class.
>
>
> I think that making Changes more flexible would be good, I'll work on
> something like this, hopefully others would be interested in Changes that
> come from non-VCS sources (I know I am, especially for release automation
> purposes, but also for things like polling to see when a build is available
> to start performance tests).

I'm wondering if we want to use changes for that. I have no idea what
would break if we'd just kick off buildrequests from a scheduler
directly, and to have the scheduler do stuff like poll for new builds.

Maybe changes should just be one kind of event to trigger a process,
rather than making everything a change.

Just fantasizing.

Axel