[Buildbot-commits] [Buildbot] #896: Replace try with a client for the force scheduler

[Buildbot]

#896: Replace try with a client for the force scheduler
------------------------------+--------------------
Reporter:  marcusl            |       Owner:
    Type:  project-idea       |      Status:  new
Priority:  major              |   Milestone:  0.9.+
 Version:  0.8.0              |  Resolution:
Keywords:  try, users, force  |
------------------------------+--------------------
Description changed by dustin:

Old description:

> We have a "try" client defined which looks for a patch in a local
> repository on a developer's system, patches it up, and submits it to
> Buildbot.  It's very ad-hoc, isn't very configurable, and hasn't gotten a
> lot of love.
>
> Now that we have a force scheduler, the better solution is for the try
> client to talk to a force scheduler, preferably using HTTP.  The client
> should also capture and send e-mail address of the submitter so that
> notifications can be sent.
>
> This allows lots of flexibility on the master side: users can set up as
> many force schedulers as they like, with different builders, properties,
> permissions, and so on.
>
> =scope=
>
> To make this project a summer's worth, it should aim to implement:
>  * a new try client
>  * improved support for DVCS's, where patches aren't required, but where
> the client must send a repository
>  * protocol support in or for the force scheduler
>  * per-scheduler authentication/authorization
>  * migration information for users of the existing try functionality

New description:

 We have a "try" client defined which looks for a patch in a local
 repository on a developer's system, patches it up, and submits it to
 Buildbot.  It's very ad-hoc, isn't very configurable, and hasn't gotten a
 lot of love.

 Now that we have a force scheduler, the better solution is for the try
 client to talk to a force scheduler, preferably using HTTP.  The client
 should also capture and send e-mail address of the submitter so that
 notifications can be sent.

 This allows lots of flexibility on the master side: users can set up as
 many force schedulers as they like, with different builders, properties,
 permissions, and so on.

 == scope ==

 To make this project a summer's worth, it should aim to implement:
  * a new try client
  * improved support for DVCS's, where patches aren't required, but where
 the client must send a repository
  * protocol support in or for the force scheduler
  * per-scheduler authentication/authorization
  * migration information for users of the existing try functionality

--

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.buildbot.net/ticket/896#comment:10>
Buildbot <http://buildbot.net/>
Buildbot: build/test automation